Statistics and the AFN

So, what makes these members of the AFNs?  Were they disenfranchised before they died, putting already vulnerable persons in peril?  Do the band lists go back to 1986 or is there an AFN cut off?  Interesting that the families have banded together, like a tribe, but without their entire membership.  You think they'd care about all Aboriginals in the AFN band lists, but, they too, seem to have written off an unknown large number of Aboriginals; that is only increased by the discounting of 1/2 the Aboriginal population - male Aboriginals.  These new victims  need to take a good, hard look at themselves.


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/sagkeeng-first-nation-has-most-unsolved-cases-of-missing-or-murdered-indigenous-women-1.3025156

Why Deal with First Nations?

AFN doesn't represent majority Aboriginals and has disenfranchised most before the AFN land and sea grants with the provincial crowns.  Not dealing with people seems to be a tend now that the AFN has received monies and lands and seas grants.  The AFN refused to deal with their National Chief and he has left.  He does claim a regional AFN based on inheritence, like a King receiving grants from the crowns.  Disrespectful and Offensive?  Fire him!

We don't recommend the crowns and companies deal with the AFN at all as the AFN doesn't represent the majority Aboriginals and the AFN has racial purity laws that are harmful everywhere.  So, why be surprised when that a special committee, meeting in secret, chose only have the Aboriginals, by gender, investigated by the police?  The other half are discounted, not even considered.  So, the police investigated and found that over 70% of Aboriginals murdered or missing were the result of other Aboriginals, who the police identify as males.  Gender issues?  The committe should be pleased it found what it looked for....

Evidence?  The AFN never provides this, especially when it comes to monies.  It's a 'cultural thing...'






http://www.torontosun.com/2015/04/03/first-nations-chiefs-call-for-firing-of-aboriginal-affairs-minister

'No Promises of Jobs or Cash'

Well, that's the problem with, for example, the AFN in Alberta.   Some AFN colonies get cash and others don't and, surprise, the AFNs without complain, usually environmental or traditional resource based, while the paid AFNs are eerily quiet; about everything.  Same problem here.  It's resources like whales and salmon, moose and trees and lands and seas.  This is the real problem, not the transference of whales to gold, salmon to diamonds, moose and trees to oil.  The AFN claim traditional resources as a way of claiming the transference.  The only problem is the AFN is territorial, which the indigenous peoples are not and never were - beyond the concept of hunter gatherers, but not traditionally nomadic, following natural resources all over North America and adventuring to today, like the voyagers finding sea canoes and rivers of resources.


As we've said  in the past, the future is not the AFN.  It is a direct benefit to each and every Aboriginal, regardless of where they've been told to live and borders.  This is the only way to be fair in all this.  The Prime Minister has responded with direct benefits to those who can afford to have children.  This is, we feel, is a traditional way of taking benefits away from Aboriginals - the government should do this for everyone, not just Aboriginals.  A greed that shows itself in the recent AFN and provincial crowns deals.  So, the government ends up paying again after admitting they made errors in benfiting Aboriginals - usually when the cash and resources are long gone.




  http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/clyde-river-nunavut-takes-on-oil-industry-over-seismic-testing-1.3014742?cmp=rss

Majority Aboriginals, Disenfranchised by the AFN, Discount Most Treaties #TreatyOn

The Crowns they made deals with changed who the treaty is with - like housing.  Over the last ten years we've seen the AFN treaty away federal agreements for provincial cash and lands.  Majority Aboriginals usually receive no benefit from treaties and aren't' counted by the AFN as aboriginal or to vote or be counted by the AFN Bands for housing and other benefits.


AFN treatying reprenents a small majority of Aboriginals.  Can we check the band lists from early on?






https://twitter.com/hashtag/TreatyON?src=hash&lang=en
Aboriginal Affairs ‏@ONAboriginal 1h1 hour ago

Help us raise awareness of treaties! Learn & join the conversation with #TreatyON. RT to spread the word!

Majority Aboriginals, Disenfranchised by the AFN, do not recognize AFN Ownership of Canadian Lands and Seas

The AFN bars Aboriginals from AFN Crowns lands and seas grants.  While the crowns representatives are allowed seats, majority Aboriginals are barred.  Sounds the same as the colonies and confederation of  provinces.


The AFN should renounce all violence, not bills they've agreed to live under.


http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/bill-c-51-hearings-first-nations-could-be-targetted-lawyer-says-1.3006731

While the AFN and Crowns have Settled, Majority Aboriginals have not

Like the settlers colonies receiving lands and seas grants from the crown, so has the AFN.  Majority Aboriginals, e.g. the AFN disenfranchised,  haven't been consulted and still have valid claims to lands and seas resources that have yet to be reconciled.


http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1419280182333/1421883201219?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=aandc&utm_content=03.23.15&utm_campaign=07677

'Targeted' Investing

This just puts money meant for Aboriginals into the provincial and AFN employees pockets.  There is no accounting for the AFN disenfranchised Aboriginals on the band lists all over Canada.  Most Aboriginals have been forced out by the AFN and are not allowed to participate in the resource use by the provinces and the AFN.  Of course, there will be accountability.......


http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/harper-wynne-governments-invest-first-nations-economic-development-ring-fire-region-1996110.htm