It seems strange that the Liberals made promises to the AFN party should they win, but Wynne did promise not to sell Hydro One if her party won. Both the NDP and Liberals did treaty with the AFN party through their AFN/INM faction.
What Trudeau should investigate, if he really cares about Aboriginals and democracy, is who does the AFN really represent and how?
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/trudeaus-promises-to-aboriginal-people-feared-to-be-unachievable/article26946111/
Well, considering PM and Premier are political appointments of the party elite like Chins, Russia, England, etc. parliamentary systems; AFN hidden party election shouldn't scare anyone since the AFN has agreements with Liberal party. 'All based on popular vote.'
Trust these?
Record 10 indigenous MPs elected to the House of Commons https://t.co/DXPMCfoxST https://t.co/4FGwBmRrrZ https://twitter.com/CBCNews/status/656511482981711872 Share this post with more networks: http://ow.ly/3ykOeV
NDP won't. Liberals won't. AFN treaties with both and they won't. So, suspects like everyone else.
Us? 100% Non Violent Zero Tolerance®™
Come on; what do they
have2lose?...
Well, all people are persons(see timeline). The city shouldn't divide, halving, Aboriginal persons by gender. It's what political appointee party elite and terrorists do; could'a gone with'folks.'
Maybe I'll pray and dance to the 'great spirit...'
#CityofTO proclaims October 18, 2015 as Persons Day to acknowledge and honour women who are making invaluable contributions to our City. https://twitter.com/TorontoComms/status/655700463002767360 Share this post with more networks: http://ow.ly/3ykixx
See timeline.
This makes the migration hanging a left at the Russian steps to the new world more interesting, although this may be considered part of Asia, but attempts to explain 'modern' humans polar trek instead of shorter across the pond as the weather, being warmer at the pole?, and 'nonhuman' occupation of Europe stifling the modern migration. What if the two got together and jumped the pond? Anyway, old arguments. Farther and farther back.
The article mentions mutation rate. See timeline. Indigenous North Americans, first people, have a faster genetic change than most. This needs to be factored in if that's mutation rate.
Still no answer how Indigenous north american first people, haplogroup x (1985/6), got here. Space ship? Time travel teeth...
Fossil teeth place humans in Asia '20,000 years early'
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/15/china/china-teeth-cave-nature/
just like lands and seas grants.
So, define AFN 'youth movement'
Sure your not tools in the NDP,etc. toolbox? On call protestors for fascists? Honda? Violent movements?...
http://www.chiefs-of-ontario.org/node/1265
The AFN and the provincial crown lay claim to resources that are for all Aboriginals and always have been.
Your agreements don't mean much. All Aorigi als have rights to the AFN and provincial crownd grants and claims.
We won't be barred from our resources.
http://www.vancouversun.com/touch/story.html?id=11434761
No one else. Seems to be an elitist club, so people can say; 'we're working with Aboriginals...'
http://www.thestarphoenix.com/touch/story.html?id=11432669
Or ousted if anyone's interested in being no word words.
Read one of the Toronto free dailies today and it had an interview with Clinton. A lot of politics lately, see most recent posts.
Well, trading being what it is I'm supposed to wonder about ancestors. When Europeans and perhaps also the recent 'land/ice bridge' migrations came to Canada, North America, it is rumoured our indigenous ancestors weren't considered human. Savages without benefit of 'civilization.' As genetics prove Indigenous Canadians, North America's First People, date back over 15,000 years, the non human stories get more wild. Our Indigenous ancestors were not considered 'modern' humans. This story is complicated by a recent discovery in Mexico of an artifact 13,000 years old, approximately, that some consider not human. This occurred after the AFN ordered a study of their ancestoral migration, west coast, that genetics indicate are a recent migration, well under 5000 years old. Mexico is part of North America and the AFN and others would simply dismiss older migrations as not modern, non human, as has been the excuse in the past.
The difficulty here, aside from the recent migrations commonly excusing those there before them as savages, non humans; is that genetics indicate that Indigenous North Americans did not use the 'land/ice bridge' and are more European than the recent migrations. Across the pond, over a shallower Atlantic on strong currents between Americas and Europe like Ireland, Scotland, British Isles. The Mexican discovery seems to indicate another route from South America, although this is mostly discounted as the 'land/ice bridge' too.
It's difficult to argue that Indigenous Canadians, first people, are not human since the genetics indicate Europe to North America before 'land/sea bridge' migrations came all the way around or from Pacific islands. We did, however, leave Africa north.
In lore as Europeans, Pacific islanders, 'bridge' people and other recent migrations discovered our ancestors, first people, they discounted them as non human. We are all familiar with the savage and non civilized non human discounting.
Another, more recent story might be non humans are made human by being consumed by a 'great spirit.' This is what migrations brought to the first peoples. Eternal life, their lives consumed, catalogued and preserved and civilized. One might say resting in the clouds of computers. Others might call it a disease brought by the recent migrations. Either way, first contact was always an aggressor, trying to make the ancestors something they're not, raising them... to migrations standards. All disease and consuming.
Yes, we believe in the great spirit... animals have spirits...we have governments...we trade...we dance...we have meetings and treaties...the environment is special to us...we build houses...we farm...we have medicine...etc.
The only thing agreeable compromises with migrations seem to lack is agreement that Indigenous North Americans ranged all over North America; no boundaries or territories...
So sure, we're really consumed and made human and modern stored in a computer. What is more non human?
Or ousted if anyone's interested in being no word words.
Read one of the Toronto free dailies today and it had an interview with Clinton. A lot of politics lately, see most recent posts.
Well, trading being what it is I'm supposed to wonder about ancestors. When Europeans and perhaps also the recent 'land/ice bridge' migrations came to Canada, North America, it is rumoured our indigenous ancestors weren't considered human. Savages without benefit of 'civilization.' As genetics prove Indigenous Canadians, North America's First People, date back over 15,000 years, the non human stories get more wild. Our Indigenous ancestors were not considered 'modern' humans. This story is complicated by a recent discovery in Mexico of an artifact 13,000 years old, approximately, that some consider not human. This occurred after the AFN ordered a study of their ancestoral migration, west coast, that genetics indicate are a recent migration, well under 5000 years old. Mexico is part of North America and the AFN and others would simply dismiss older migrations as not modern, non human, as has been the excuse in the past.
The difficulty here, aside from the recent migrations commonly excusing those there before them as savages, non humans; is that genetics indicate that Indigenous North Americans did not use the 'land/ice bridge' and are more European than the recent migrations. Across the pond, over a shallower Atlantic on strong currents between Americas and Europe like Ireland, Scotland, British Isles. The Mexican discovery seems to indicate another route from South America, although this is mostly discounted as the 'land/ice bridge' too.
It's difficult to argue that Indigenous Canadians, first people, are not human since the genetics indicate Europe to North America before 'land/sea bridge' migrations came all the way around or from Pacific islands. We did, however, leave Africa north.
In lore as Europeans, Pacific islanders, 'bridge' people and other recent migrations discovered our ancestors, first people, they discounted them as non human. We are all familiar with the savage and non civilized non human discounting.
Another, more recent story might be non humans are made human by being consumed by a 'great spirit.' This is what migrations brought to the first peoples. Eternal life, their lives consumed, catalogued and preserved and civilized. One might say resting in the clouds of computers. Others might call it a disease brought by the recent migrations. Either way, first contact was always an aggressor, trying to make the ancestors something they're not, raising them... to migrations standards. All disease and consuming.
Yes, we believe in the great spirit... animals have spirits...we have governments...we trade...we dance...we have meetings and treaties...the environment is special to us...we build houses...we farm...we have medicine...etc.
The only thing agreeable compromises with migrations seem to lack is agreement that Indigenous North Americans ranged all over North America; no boundaries or territories...
So sure, we're really consumed and made human and modern stored in a computer. What is more non human?
.....
@680NEWS: Trudeau faces renewed attack in noisy start to final week of federal campaign: http://ow.ly/TjAar #elxn42 http://twitter.com/680NEWS/status/653678278331514880/photo/1 Shared via TweetCaster
Many AFN chapters are the result of recent migrations. Like renaming things over a relatively innocuous migration, motives of 'friends' might be suspect.
http://www.cbc.ca/m/news/canada/ottawa/indigenous-people-in-ottawa-want-to-reclaim-thanksgiving-day-columbus-day-1.3264648
Especially in education where majority Aboriginals are outside AFN and AFN claims.
AFN doesn't represent most Aboriginals, although AFN claims many.
http://m.hilltimes.com/news/news/2015/10/12/funding-partnership-needs-to-come-before-any-new-first-nations-education-bill/43693
Don't become a foot soldier of the party elite's lap dogs.
Demand a vote in a national union of Aboriginals. Create one......
http://www.cbc.ca/radio/unreserved/the-power-of-the-indigenous-vote-a-potential-political-game-changer-1.3263046/callingbull-to-c-51-the-influence-of-the-indigenous-vote-1.3264447
where their money went? Why these Aboriginals received no benefit and died? The only way out seems to be a well financed and beneficial rescue program from the AFN.
Lives must be saved. That's the mandate.
http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/blog.html?b=news.nationalpost.com//full-comment/christie-blatchford-everyday-life-was-the-trauma-for-these-vibrant-first-nations-youth-who-died-far-too-young
Before Columbus. Like the ice-land bridge recent immigrants.
Indigenous people, first peoples, pre date these as 15,000+ years in North America.
https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&sa=t&url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/indigenous-peoples-day_56181a6ce4b0dbb8000e974a&ct=ga&cd=CAEYASoTOTI4NjE3MzYyMDkxMDY4OTMwODIZZTk4MzRmNmYxMGUyODVmMjpjYTplbjpDQQ&usg=AFQjCNGyKRbzS0FevhLluZBnQu3-WQLmvA
https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&sa=t&url=http://wivb.com/2015/10/09/some-municipalities-will-celebrate-indigenous-peoples-day-for-the-first-time/&ct=ga&cd=CAEYACoTNzg3Mzg1MzI5MjkwMzMxMTAxODIZZTk4MzRmNmYxMGUyODVmMjpjYTplbjpDQQ&usg=AFQjCNEh463YAK3wU7N8d8JQf9bL-EZiCw
most are.
Spending billions on the smallest number of Aboriginals.
Disenfranchised.....
http://aptn.ca/news/2015/10/07/ndp-promise-on-core-first-nation-education-richest-among-three-main-federal-parties/
Unfortunately the AFN won't release the information making an objective investigation impossible.
http://www.castanet.net/news/BC/149355/Leaders-demand-inquiry
Just AFN party. Education cash will be funneled through NDP friendly provincial employees. AFN is upset because they blew any money to AFN first deals.
Aboriginal education should include Aboriginals who are outside AFN claims. The majority.
Everything will be AFN claimed territories friendly, avoiding paying over 90% of Aboriginals.
The murdered, missing and self murder investigations will have to include all Aboriginals. Unfortunately, we believe most were disenfranchised by AFN who pocketed millions meant to help Aboriginals, making Aboriginals highly vulnerable. This also must be part of any investigation.
http://www.timescolonist.com/news/national/ndp-promises-4-8-billion-over-eight-years-for-aboriginal-education-1.2080092
or the recent immigrations...
This can be determined with a simple test.
Let's!
http://m.sacurrent.com/sanantonio/why-it-is-so-hard-for-sa-to-embrace-indigenous-peoples-day/Content?oid=2475994
Barring Aboriginals
https://twitter.com/ElizabethMay/status/651575428608602112
See AFN-INM faction treaty with NDP and liberal federal policy leaders in timeline.
Well, maybe the NDP and AFN feds need Ontario provincial AFN chiefs? See previous post.
Aboriginal healthcare has trashed since AFN took over in BC. Not in Ontario. Intra provincial class action might confuse everyone into thinking Aboriginal healthcare was always federal with no rights to transferring, to the AFN. Maybe too much like schooling.
Well, mess with the provincial bull, get the horns. I know AFN doesn't represent me...
http://www.vancouversun.com/touch/story.html?id=11417908&google_editors_picks=true
If they're getting any of my health information it's called 'class action.'
Seems just to be the AFN version of colonial premiere, like Wynne. No vote, no impeachment, recall. The AFN is really a one party system(see AFN-INM faction treaties with fed NDP & liberal parties in timeline).
Not kidding about class action.
http://www.chiefs-of-ontario.org/node/1259
It's supposedly a 'cultural thing' too. Well, it's obvious at the individual chapter level where a few AFN 'reprentatives,' political party elite, often an appointees, and a few members that are not 'undesireable' and AFN disenfranchised, share Aboriginal incomes and resource lands and seas grants from the provinces and federal assistance.
So, considering, especially recently, that the few AFN aboriginals have stolen majority Aboriginal incomes from the provinces by reflecting a crown / colonies relationship towards AFN confederation, why not open up the AFN benefits to all Aboriginals federally, much less provincially? Pretty sure it's greed, AFN stealing again, just as the other colonies before them. Crowns happy they pay off only a very few.
There's other considerations to AFN greed. Many AFNs aren't even first peoples. Recent migrations. AFN racial purity laws. AFN 'culture,' like AFN 'hereditary chiefs' as the AFN PM. We call those kings and queens in Polynesia. Nothing indigenous about those....
Check our timeline.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/business/b-c-first-nation-expects-lucrative-deal-over-lng-export-plant-1.2593269
