.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26378027

Posted via Blogaway

There Before We Arrived

Natives, Aboriginals.  Indigenous people are the first migration.  Genetically, secondary migrations usually do make contributions.

The land bridge theory only validates that migratins may have occurred.  The idea that indigenous people survived recent 'ice ages' is common and scientists look for validation.  Ths theory tries to excuse the dificulty of genetic and other artifacts around 10,000 years.  It does not explain indigenous genetic artifacts on the Calfornia coast at 15,000 years plus.  Rather than focusing on validating migrations other than indigenous and 'ice age' survival, although very interesting, the research should focus on actual indigenous people.  The great lakes always were home to indigenous people long before secondary migrations, 'ice ages, and 'land bridges.'  More interesting might be the 'ice age oasis' where indigenous people survived siberian and polar vortices cold - the current expressions of the 'ice ages.'  The 'land bridge oasis' could be further investigated as the meeting of indigenous people and migrations meeting, probably more popular from cultural perspectives than boring genetics.  Maybe a movie.....

Secondary migrations are recent and not indigenous and the 'land bridge' theory needs to be expressed from an indigenous perspective rather than post indigenous migrations.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2569469/Mystery-Native-Americans-missing-10-000-years-solved.html

Posted via Blogaway

'High Artic' '800,000 Years'

'Inaccessible'

http://m.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/canada-siding-with-us-denmark-on-high-arctic-fishing-moratorium/article17061264/?service=mobile&cmpid=rss1

Posted via Blogaway

.

The Hill (thehill): Kerry to create Arctic envoy http://trib.al/lFtaMuT by @JPecquetTheHill http://twitter.com/thehill/status/434447488771436544 (Sent via Seesmic http://www.hootsuite.com)

Posted via Blogaway

Recent Migrations

Any scientist would be skeptical.  The paper mentiins genome sequenced ties to a migration based on non human artifacts dating and human artifact associated dating with no mention of haplo group, but ties to what mention consider indigenous peoples or 'clovis culture' in what we consider still fairly recent dates.  We pay attentiin at 15,000 + human artifact actual human genome sequencing or 'Genetic Archeology.' 

We recommend an actual scientific study and publication and disposition by actual indigenous persons rather than risky science and hiding of artifacts under mystery and illusion of culture.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ancient-genome-suggests-native-americans-really-did-descend-from-the-first-americans/

Posted via Blogaway

De Evolving - Trades

Tony Clement (TonyclementCPC): Bill C-15 Northwest Territories Devolution Act-Report Stage passes the Commons 279 to 2. #cdnpoli http://twitter.com/TonyclementCPC/status/433742558913519616 (Sent via Seesmic http://www.hootsuite.com)

Posted via Blogaway

Canadian National Resource Audit

We don't think the audit for direct benefits should be based on Premiers, 'lobbying' for extractors or planning to circumvent or cost an audit that hasnt been done.  This reminds of a Province that, a few months ago, reaffirmed its claims and refusal to pay federal taxes on Indigenous resource use.

The audit is simple and can be payed out in a month. 

http://www.calgaryherald.com/touch/story.html?id=9485227

Posted via Blogaway